Thread

Commits

Doc: remove stale entry for removed aclitem[] ~ aclitem operator.
- cbca4d3a83d9 16 (unreleased) landed
- b94996ddd70b 14 (unreleased) landed
- b4db796b192c 18 (unreleased) landed
- 6e49974e86d3 17 (unreleased) landed
- 5be9f84fe375 15 (unreleased) landed
- 2963ddeef2be 19 (unreleased) landed
Remove deprecated containment operators for built-in types
- 2f70fdb0644c 14.0 cited

doc: Remove stale entry for removed aclitem[] ~ aclitem operator

Shinya Kato <shinya11.kato@gmail.com> — 2026-06-14T04:42:57Z

Hi,

Commit 2f70fdb0644 removed the operator ~(aclitem[],aclitem), but
missed removing its entry from the aclitem operators table in the
documentation.

When running the following SQL:

postgres=# SELECT oid::regoperator, oprcode FROM pg_operator WHERE
oprright = 'aclitem'::regtype;
          oid          |   oprcode
-----------------------+-------------
 +(aclitem[],aclitem)  | aclinsert
 -(aclitem[],aclitem)  | aclremove
 @>(aclitem[],aclitem) | aclcontains
 =(aclitem,aclitem)    | aclitemeq
(4 rows)

But, ~(aclitem[],aclitem) is documented.

This patch removes it. Thoughts?

-- 
Best regards,
Shinya Kato
NTT OSS Center

Re: doc: Remove stale entry for removed aclitem[] ~ aclitem operator

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2026-06-14T15:02:28Z

Shinya Kato <shinya11.kato@gmail.com> writes:
> Commit 2f70fdb0644 removed the operator ~(aclitem[],aclitem), but
> missed removing its entry from the aclitem operators table in the
> documentation.

Good catch, pushed.

			regards, tom lane