Re: [PATCH v20] GSSAPI encryption support
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com>
Date: 2019-04-04T02:09:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Greetings, On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 22:02 Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 05:51:06PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > > Thanks so much for pushing on it for so long, it’s a great feature to > have! > > Glad to see that the final result is using an API layer in > be-secure.c and that we have tests. Now, shouldn't there be some > documentation in protocol.sgml for the read and write handling of the > encrypted messages? Other drivers could need to implement that stuff, > no? We have that for SSL, with SSLRequest and such. Yes, that’s a fair point. I’ll work on adding documentation to protocol.sgml for the GSSAPI encrypted setup and message passing. Thanks, Stephen >
Commits
-
GSSAPI encryption support
- b0b39f72b990 12.0 landed
-
Fix typo
- 57c932475504 9.6.0 cited