Horton
Menu

Re: 10.0

Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>

View thread
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2016-05-13T16:12:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Friday, May 13, 2016, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:

> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:05:34PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >> * Dave Page (dpage@pgadmin.org <javascript:;>) wrote:
> >> > I imagine the bigger issue will be apps that have been written
> >> > assuming the first part of the version number is only a single digit.
> >>
> >> Let's just go with 2016 instead then.
> >>
> >> At least then users would see how old the version they're running is (I
> >> was just recently dealing with a 8.4 user...).
> >
> > We tried, that, "Postgres95".  ;-)
>
> Awesome: Postgres16 > Postgres95.
>
> That won't be confusing now will it? :-)
>

We'll just say you have to be using a special collation with 9.5.0 to get
the right sort order.. ;)

/me hides from Peter

Thanks!

Stephen