Re: simple patch for discussion

 On 7/16/25 11:01 PM, David Rowley wrote:
> Is "alter table ... set (parallel_workers=N);" not easy enough?

No opinions on the merit of the patch, but it's not as easy as better
default behavior, right? That is, the important questions are whether
the proposed behavior is better, and whether the change in default
behavior is likely to cause any problems. If there's uncertainty about
those, the options for a workaround are, of course, relevant.