Re: [PATCH] Reserve protocol 3.1 explicitly in pqcomm.h
Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
From: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-01-20T23:17:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 3:10 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > How about "PG_PROTOCOL_RESERVED_31" or > "PG_PROTOCOL_UNUSED_31"? I'd be fine with either; slight preference for "RESERVED" I suppose? Thanks! --Jacob
Commits
-
pqcomm.h: Explicitly reserve protocol v3.1
- f7521bf721d1 19 (unreleased) landed