Re: Proposal: Make cfbot fail on patches not created by "git format-patch"
Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
From: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
Jelte Fennema-Nio <me@jeltef.nl>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Date: 2025-05-19T15:10:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 6:23 AM Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com> wrote: > In my experience people who have been contributing for some time use > format-patch and provide at least a draft of the commit message, > because they know it's more convenient both for the reviewers (the > patch has better chances to be reviewed and tested), and for the > authors to rebase the patch after a while. Newcomers sometimes submit > patches that don't even target the `master` branch, and they don't > know we have cfbot. While I don't necessarily disagree with these two endpoints, I also think there are a number of contributors who occupy a spot somewhere in between -- and there were _many_ people at the unconference session who were interested in automatically communicating our community norms in some way. I think that's enough motivation to try something like Jelte's latest "quality check" proposal. --Jacob