Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
meson: Fix install-quiet after clean
- a9ffb35274fb 18.0 landed
- 4ae03be54734 19 (unreleased) landed
-
oauth: Run Autoconf tests with correct compiler flags
- 3d23f68c5529 18.0 landed
- 990571a08b66 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Link libpq with libdl if the platform needs that.
- 4df477153a6b 19 (unreleased) landed
- 7bd752c1fb8e 18.0 landed
-
Doc: correct spelling of meson switch.
- 3faac9d14063 16.9 landed
- 766d2e673342 17.5 landed
- ac557793d478 18.0 landed
-
oauth: Correct SSL dependency for libpq-oauth.a
- 3db68212a393 18.0 landed
-
oauth: Fix Autoconf build on macOS
- 4ea1254f35b2 18.0 cited
-
oauth: Move the builtin flow into a separate module
- b0635bfda053 18.0 landed
-
Remove a stray "pgrminclude" annotation
- 764d501d24ba 18.0 cited
-
oauth: Simplify copy of PGoauthBearerRequest
- 1cf4c56480f8 18.0 landed
-
oauth: Improve validator docs on interruptibility
- 873c0fd67872 18.0 landed
-
oauth: Disallow synchronous DNS in libcurl
- d7e40845f923 18.0 landed
-
oauth: Fix postcondition for set_timer on macOS
- 434dbf6907ec 18.0 landed
-
oauth: Use IPv4-only issuer in oauth_validator tests
- 8d9d5843b55f 18.0 landed
-
Work around OAuth/EVFILT_TIMER quirk on NetBSD.
- c301a0a74a8a 18.0 landed
-
oauth: Fix incorrect const markers in struct
- 03366b61dfe5 18.0 landed
-
Add missing entry to oauth_validator test .gitignore
- 2c53dec7f440 18.0 landed
-
cirrus: Temporarily fix libcurl link error
- 9d9a71002a1c 18.0 landed
-
Add support for OAUTHBEARER SASL mechanism
- b3f0be788afc 18.0 landed
-
libpq: Handle asynchronous actions during SASL
- a99a32e43ed7 18.0 landed
-
require_auth: prepare for multiple SASL mechanisms
- f8d8581ed882 18.0 landed
-
Move PG_MAX_AUTH_TOKEN_LENGTH to libpq/auth.h
- e21d6f297158 18.0 landed
-
Make SASL max message length configurable
- 6d16f9debae0 18.0 landed
-
jsonapi: fully initialize dummy lexer
- 41b023946dfd 18.0 landed
-
common/jsonapi: support libpq as a client
- 0785d1b8b2fa 18.0 landed
-
Remove fe_memutils from libpgcommon_shlib
- f1976df5eaf2 18.0 landed
-
Revert ECPG's use of pnstrdup()
- f0096ef13be2 13.17 landed
- 3557185538fe 14.14 landed
- 2de129b356bf 15.9 landed
- ee2997c678d8 16.5 landed
- e9e05c655069 17.0 landed
- 5388216f6adc 18.0 landed
-
Explicitly require password for SCRAM exchange
- adcdb2c8dda4 17.0 landed
-
Refactor SASL exchange to return tri-state status
- 24178e235ea5 17.0 landed
Attachments
- since-v23.diff.txt (text/plain)
- v24-0003-common-jsonapi-support-libpq-as-a-client.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v24-0003
- v24-0004-libpq-add-OAUTHBEARER-SASL-mechanism.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v24-0004
- v24-0002-Remove-fe_memutils-from-libpgcommon_shlib.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v24-0002
- v24-0001-Revert-ECPG-s-use-of-pnstrdup.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v24-0001
- v24-0006-Review-comments.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v24-0006
- v24-0005-backend-add-OAUTHBEARER-SASL-mechanism.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v24-0005
- v24-0007-DO-NOT-MERGE-Add-pytest-suite-for-OAuth.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v24-0007
Hi Daniel, On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 3:07 PM Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Of the Cirrus machines, it looks like only FreeBSD has a new enough > libcurl for that. Ubuntu won't until 24.04, Debian Bookworm doesn't > have it unless you're running backports, RHEL 9 is still on 7.x... I > think requiring libcurl 8 is effectively saying no one will be able to > use this for a long time. Is there an alternative? Since the exit() checks appear to be happy now that fe_memutils is out, I've lowered the requirement to the version of libcurl that seems to be shipped in RHEL 8 (7.61.0). This also happens to be when TLS 1.3 ciphersuite control was added to Curl, which seems like something we may want in the very near future, so I'm taking that as a good sign for what is otherwise a very arbitrary cutoff point. Counterproposals welcome :D > Good catch. application/json no longer defines charsets officially > [1], so I think we should be able to just ignore them. The new > strncasecmp needs to handle a spurious prefix, too; I have that on my > TODO list. I've expanded this handling in v24, attached. > This new way doesn't do the same thing. Here's a sample error: > > connection to server at "127.0.0.1", port 56619 failed: failed to > fetch OpenID discovery document: Weird server reply ( Trying > 127.0.0.1:36647... > Connected to localhost (127.0.0.1) port 36647 (#0) > Mark bundle as not supporting multiuse > HTTP 1.0, assume close after body > Invalid Content-Length: value > Closing connection 0 > ) > > IMO that's too much noise. Prior to the change, the same error would have been > > connection to server at "127.0.0.1", port 56619 failed: failed to > fetch OpenID discovery document: Weird server reply (Invalid > Content-Length: value) I have reverted this change for now, but I'm still hoping there's an alternative that can help us clean up? > `running` can be set to zero on success, too. I'm having trouble > forcing that code path in a test so far, but we're going to have to do > something special in that case. For whatever reason, the magic timing for this is popping up more and more often on Cirrus, leading to really annoying test failures. So I may have to abandon the search for a perfect test case and just fix it. > > I did drop > > the Python pytest patch since I feel that it's unlikely to go in from this > > thread (adding pytest seems worthy of its own thread and discussion), and the > > weight of it makes this seem scarier than it is. > > Until its coverage gets ported over, can we keep it as a `DO NOT > MERGE` patch? Otherwise there's not much to run in Cirrus. I have added this back (marked loudly as don't-merge) so that we keep the test coverage for now. The Perl suite (plus Python server) has been tricked out a lot more in v24, so it shouldn't be too bad to get things ported. > > Next I intend to work on writing documentation for this. > > Awesome, thank you! I will start adding coverage to the new code paths. Peter E asked for some documentation stubs to ease review, which I've added. Hopefully that doesn't step on your toes any. A large portion of your "Review comments" patch has been pulled backwards into the previous commits; the remaining pieces are things I'm still peering at and/or writing tests for. I also owe this thread an updated roadmap and summary, to make it a little less daunting for new reviewers. Soon (tm). Thanks! --Jacob