Re: [PATCH] Reorganize pqcomm.h a bit

On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 2:01 PM Jacob Champion
<jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Good point. I think "actual protocol version" might get a little
> confusing for a casual reader if/when your _GREASE macro arrives,
> though. I'll do some wordsmithing.

Actually, maybe brevity is best, as in v2? They're reserved, they're
special; readers can look at the comment for the reservation in
question to find out why, and then we don't have to generalize in the
section header.

--Jacob