Re: Periodic authorization expiration checks using GoAway message
Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
From: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
To: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannuk@google.com>, Ajit Awekar <ajitpostgres@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Date: 2025-12-16T19:53:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 1:50 PM Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl> wrote: > What metadata > are you worried about changing mid transaction that could mess stuff > up? The primary one I can imagine is the username The HBA inputs can't be allowed to change; that's not what I'm worried about. The system_user might change. Cached SCRAM keys can change. Every certificate-derived piece of metadata in sslinfo could change. MyProcPort->peer and MyProcPort->gss might be wholly reassigned. And any user-metadata functions provided by OAuth validator modules would need to carefully consider their volatility guarantees at minimum. There's probably more. --Jacob