Re: Fix the race condition for updating slot minimum LSN

surya poondla <suryapoondla4@gmail.com>

From: surya poondla <suryapoondla4@gmail.com>
To: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Date: 2026-04-14T23:25:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi Hou zj,

Thanks for the patch. The fix looks correct and the approach mirrors the
one taken in commit 2a5225b for the xmin race.

I have a question about copy_replication_slot() in slotfuncs.c, the
restart_lsn is written under only the spinlock, followed by
ReplicationSlotsComputeRequiredLSN() the same pattern that this patch
fixes. Could this path be affected by the same race?

Looking at the code, I think it is safe because
create_logical_replication_slot() is called with src_restart_lsn which is
always a valid LSN (if not valid, an error is thrown). Inside
CreateInitDecodingContext(), since restart_lsn is valid,
ReplicationSlotReserveWal() is skipped and the slot's restart_lsn is set
directly to src_restart_lsn. So by the time the write of the slot happens,
the destination slot already has a valid non-zero restart_lsn, the
InvalidXLogRecPtr window never exists. Additionally, line the code errors
out if copy_restart_lsn < src_restart_lsn, so the write never moves
restart_lsn backward, meaning a concurrent scanner will always see a valid
LSN and never skip this slot.

If that reasoning is correct, a comment near the
ReplicationSlotsComputeRequiredLSN() in copy_replication_slot() explaining
why it does not need the same protection would help future readers.

Regards,
Surya Poondla

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Fix a race condition in updating procArray->replication_slot_xmin.