Re: 2 server with same configuration but huge difference in performance
Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
From: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
To: Sumeet Shukla <sumeet.k.shukla@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>, "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-08-01T16:13:47Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Sumeet Shukla <sumeet.k.shukla@gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems that it is happening because of the way the database is created. On
> an old database it runs perfectly fine or if I use the old DB as template to
> create the new one, it runs fine. But if I create a new DB with same
> settings and permissions it hangs. I'm now trying to find the difference
> between these 2 databases.
Likely a difference in encoding or collation. What does \l show you
(that's a lower case L btw)
smarlowe=> \l
List of databases
Name | Owner | Encoding | Collate | Ctype |
Access privileges
-----------+----------+----------+-------------+-------------+-----------------------
postgres | smarlowe | UTF8 | en_US.UTF-8 | en_US.UTF-8 |
smarlowe | smarlowe | UTF8 | en_US.UTF-8 | en_US.UTF-8 |
UTF8 and en_US are much more expensive than SQL_ASCII and C would be
for text and such. Basically indexes either don't work or work as well
under en_US if you're comparing or sorting text.