Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning
Beena Emerson <memissemerson@gmail.com>
From: Beena Emerson <memissemerson@gmail.com>
To: Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan.ladhe@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-06-04T18:36:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hello, On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan.ladhe@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have addressed Ashutosh's and Amit's comments in the attached patch. > > Please let me know if I have missed anything and any further comments. > > PFA. > > Regards, > Jeevan Ladhe > What is the reason the new patch does not mention of violating rows when a new partition overlaps with default? Is it because more than one row could be violating the condition? -- Beena Emerson EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Commits
-
Allow a partitioned table to have a default partition.
- 6f6b99d1335b 11.0 landed
-
Adjust min/max values when changing sequence type
- 60a0b2ec8943 10.0 cited
-
BRIN auto-summarization
- 7526e10224f0 10.0 cited