Re: Obsolete comment in pg_stat_statements
Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-09-15T02:30:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 14 Sept 2024, 23:44 Tom Lane, <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes: > > On Sat, 14 Sept 2024, 12:39 Tom Lane, <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> Hmm ... I agree that para is out of date, but is there anything to > >> salvage rather than just delete it? > > > I thought about it but I think that now that knowledge is in the else > > branch, with the mention that we still have to bump the nesting level > even > > if it's not locally handled. > > After sleeping on it I looked again, and I think you're right, > there's no useful knowledge remaining in this para. Pushed. thanks!
Commits
-
Remove obsolete comment in pg_stat_statements.
- e3b2c651bcd3 17.0 landed
- 94537982ec6b 18.0 landed