Re: archive_command / pg_stat_archiver & documentation

Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Benoit Lobréau <benoit.lobreau@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-03-01T07:55:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 3:36 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:03:05AM +0100, Benoit Lobréau wrote:
> > Done here : https://commitfest.postgresql.org/32/3012/
>
> Documenting that properly for the archive command, as already done for
> restore_command, sounds good to me.  I am not sure that there is much
> point in doing a cross-reference to the archiving section for one
> specific field of pg_stat_archiver.

Agreed.

> For the second paragraph, I would recommend to move that to a
> different <para> to outline this special case, leading to the
> attached.

+1

> What do you think?

LGTM!



Commits

  1. doc: Mention archive_command failure handling on signals