Re: progress report for ANALYZE
Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro.yamada.tf@nttcom.co.jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-07-08T18:47:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 8:44 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 2:18 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > Yeah, I got the impression that that was determined to be the desirable > > behavior, so I made it do that, but I'm not really happy about it > > either. We're not too late to change the CREATE INDEX behavior, but > > let's discuss what is it that we want. > > I don't think I intended to make any such determination -- which > commit do you think established this as the canonical behavior? > > I propose that once a field is set, we should leave it set until the end. +1 Note that this patch is already behaving like that if the table only contains dead rows.
Commits
-
Doc: Fix and tweak documentation for ANALYZE reporting
- 5ba40b62318e 13.0 landed