Misleading comment in pg_upgrade.c
Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-12-05T09:17:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- fix_pgupgrade_comment.diff (application/octet-stream) patch
Hello, While reading pg_upgrade code to restore the objects on the new cluster, I noticed that 5b570d771b8 didn't adjust the database name in the comments explaining the requirements for an extra "--clean" for template1 and postgres databases. While it's true that both databases will already exist, I found it confusing to mention both names when only one is processed for each code path.
Commits
-
Improve some comments in pg_upgrade.c
- 690c880269bf 13.0 landed