Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb

On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 2:35 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 09:45:14AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 07:46:10PM +0200, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> >> Is it ok to call pg_free(slots) and let caller have a pointer pointing
> >  to freed memory?
> >
> > The interface has a Setup call which initializes the whole thing, and
> > Terminate is the logical end point, so having the free logic within
> > the termination looks more consistent to me.  We could now have actual
> > Init() and Free() but I am not sure that this justifies the move as
> > this complicates the scripts using it.
>
> I have reconsidered this point, moved the pg_free() call out of the
> termination logic, and committed the first patch after an extra lookup
> and more polishing.

Thanks!

> For the second patch, could you send a rebase with a fix for the
> connection slot when processing the reindex commands?

Attached, I also hopefully removed all the now unneeded progname usage.