Re: Proposal to Enable/Disable Index using ALTER INDEX (with patch)
Mihail Nikalayeu <michail.nikolaev@gmail.com>
From: Michail Nikolaev <michail.nikolaev@gmail.com>
To: Shayon Mukherjee <shayonj@gmail.com>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-12-30T16:08:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hello. A few comments on patch: > + temporarily reducing the overhead of index maintenance > + during bulk data loading operations > But tuples are still inserted, where the difference come from? > or verifying an index is not being used > + before dropping it Hm, it does not provide the guarantee - index may also be used as an arbiter for INSERT ON CONFLICT, for example. For that case, "update pg_index set indisvalid = false" should be used before the DROP, probably. Also index may also be used for constraint, part of partitioned table, etc. Also, I think it is better to move check to indisvalid as if (!index->indisvalid || !index->indisenabled). Best regards, Mikhail.