Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Mihail Nikalayeu <michail.nikolaev@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add a test for commit ac0e33136a using the injection point.
- 8a695d7998be 18.0 landed
-
Invalidate inactive replication slots.
- ac0e33136abc 18.0 landed
-
Fix incorrect slot type in BuildTupleHashTableExt
- d96d1d5152f3 18.0 cited
-
Allow synced slots to have their inactive_since.
- 6f132ed693b6 17.0 landed
-
Change last_inactive_time to inactive_since in pg_replication_slots.
- 6d49c8d4b4f4 17.0 landed
-
Track last_inactive_time in pg_replication_slots.
- a11f330b5584 17.0 landed
-
Track invalidation_reason in pg_replication_slots.
- 6ae701b4378d 17.0 landed
-
Add option force_initdb to PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster:init()
- ff9e1e764fcc 17.0 cited
-
Add a failover option to subscriptions.
- 776621a5e479 17.0 cited
-
Allow setting failover property in the replication command.
- 73292404370c 17.0 cited
-
Allow to enable failover property for replication slots via SQL API.
- c393308b69d2 17.0 cited
-
Track conflict_reason in pg_replication_slots.
- 007693f2a3ac 17.0 cited
-
Log messages for replication slot acquisition and release.
- 7c3fb505b14e 17.0 cited
-
Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
- 1118cd37eb61 16.0 cited
-
Fix corruption due to vacuum_defer_cleanup_age underflowing 64bit xids
- be504a3e974d 16.0 cited
-
meson: Add initial version of meson based build system
- e6927270cd18 16.0 cited
Attachments
Hello everyone! Yesterday I got a strange set of test errors, probably somehow related to that patch. It happened on changed master branch (based on d96d1d5152f30d15678e08e75b42756101b7cab6) but I don't think my changes were affecting it. My setup is a little bit tricky: Windows 11 run WSL2 with Ubuntu, meson. So, `recovery ` suite started failing on: 1) at /src/test/recovery/t/019_replslot_limit.pl line 530. 2) at /src/test/recovery/t/040_standby_failover_slots_sync.pl line 198. It was failing almost every run, one test or another. I was lurking around for about 10 min, and..... it just stopped failing. And I can't reproduce it anymore. But I have logs of two fails. I am not sure if it is helpful, but decided to mail them here just in case. Best regards, Mikhail.