Horton

Re: Popcount optimization using AVX512

Ants Aasma <ants.aasma@cybertec.at>

View thread
From: Ants Aasma <ants.aasma@cybertec.at>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, "Amonson, Paul D" <paul.d.amonson@intel.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, "Shankaran, Akash" <akash.shankaran@intel.com>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-04-01T22:09:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Fix __attribute__((target(...))) usage.

  2. Use __attribute__((target(...))) for AVX-512 support.

  3. Fix code for probing availability of AVX-512.

  4. Optimize visibilitymap_count() with AVX-512 instructions.

  5. Optimize pg_popcount() with AVX-512 instructions.

  6. Inline pg_popcount() for small buffers.

  7. Avoid function call overhead of pg_popcount() in syslogger.c.

  8. Refactor code for setting pg_popcount* function pointers.

  9. Inline pg_popcount{32,64} into pg_popcount().

  10. Remove MSVC scripts

  11. Use ARMv8 CRC instructions where available.

  12. Use Intel SSE 4.2 CRC instructions where available.

On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 at 00:31, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 12:11:59AM +0300, Ants Aasma wrote:
> > What about using the masking capabilities of AVX-512 to handle the
> > tail in the same code path? Masked out portions of a load instruction
> > will not generate an exception. To allow byte level granularity
> > masking, -mavx512bw is needed. Based on wikipedia this will only
> > disable this fast path on Knights Mill (Xeon Phi), in all other cases
> > VPOPCNTQ implies availability of BW.
>
> Sounds promising.  IMHO we should really be sure that these kinds of loads
> won't generate segfaults and the like due to the masked-out portions.  I
> searched around a little bit but haven't found anything that seemed
> definitive.

Interestingly the Intel software developer manual is not exactly
crystal clear on how memory faults with masks work, but volume 2A
chapter 2.8 [1] does specify that MOVDQU8 is of exception class E4.nb
that supports memory fault suppression on page fault.

Regards,
Ants Aasma

[1] https://cdrdv2-public.intel.com/819712/253666-sdm-vol-2a.pdf