Re: storing an explicit nonce
Ants Aasma <ants@cybertec.at>
From: Ants Aasma <ants@cybertec.at>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Sasasu <i@sasa.su>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-10-12T05:40:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Rethink method for assigning OIDs to the template0 and postgres DBs.
- 2cb1272445d2 15.0 landed
-
pg_upgrade: Preserve database OIDs.
- aa01051418f1 15.0 landed
-
pg_upgrade: Preserve relfilenodes and tablespace OIDs.
- 9a974cbcba00 15.0 landed
-
Fix for new Boolean node
- cf925936ecc0 15.0 cited
-
Improve error handling of HMAC computations
- 5513dc6a304d 15.0 cited
-
Add macro RelationIsPermanent() to report relation permanence
- 95d77149c535 14.0 landed
-
Enhance nbtree index tuple deletion.
- d168b666823b 14.0 cited
On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 at 22:15, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > Yes, that's the direction that I was thinking also and specifically with > > XTS as the encryption algorithm to allow us to exclude the LSN but keep > > everything else, and to address the concern around the nonce/tweak/etc > > being the same sometimes across multiple writes. Another thing to > > consider is if we want to encrypt zero'd page. There was a point > > brought up that if we do then we are encrypting a fair bit of very > > predictable bytes and that's not great (though there's a fair bit about > > our pages that someone could quite possibly predict anyway based on > > table structures and such...). I would think that if it's easy enough > > to not encrypt zero'd pages that we should avoid doing so. Don't recall > > offhand which way zero'd pages were being handled already but thought it > > made sense to mention that as part of this discussion. > > Yeah, I wanted to mention that. I don't see any security difference > between fully-zero pages, pages with headers and no tuples, and pages > with headers and only a few tuples. If any of those are insecure, they > all are. Therefore, I don't see any reason to treat them differently. > We had to special case zero pages and not encrypt them because as far as I can tell, there is no atomic way to extend a file and initialize it to Enc(zero) in the same step. -- Ants Aasma Senior Database Engineerwww.cybertec-postgresql.com