Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication
Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>
From: Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Nitin Motiani <nitinmotiani@google.com>,
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-09-09T05:21:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix typo in test file name added in commit 4909b38af0.
- 50b8ad30f754 18.0 landed
- d96206f259d6 17.5 landed
- 9987c94662c2 16.9 landed
- 90bc4523fd47 15.13 landed
- bb1bc9fa962e 14.18 landed
- 4164d6976316 13.21 landed
-
Fix data loss in logical replication.
- 247ee94150b6 13.21 landed
- 4909b38af034 18.0 landed
- cadaf0ac4637 17.5 landed
- 9a2f8b4f01d5 16.9 landed
- 9f21be08e884 15.13 landed
- 0434033e8bb5 14.18 landed
-
Avoid invalidating all RelationSyncCache entries on publication rename.
- 3abe9dc18892 18.0 cited
-
Remove obsolete RECHECK keyword completely
- 7da1bdc2c2f1 18.0 cited
-
Backport BackgroundPsql perl test module
- 187b8991f70f 16.4 cited
Attachments
- test3.pl (application/octet-stream)
On Mon, 2 Sept 2024 at 10:12, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 3:06 PM Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Next I am planning to test solely on the logical decoding side and > > will share the results. > > > > Thanks, the next set of proposed tests makes sense to me. It will also > be useful to generate some worst-case scenarios where the number of > invalidations is more to see the distribution cost in such cases. For > example, Truncate/Drop a table with 100 or 1000 partitions. > > -- > With Regards, > Amit Kapila. Also, I did testing with a table with partitions. To test for the scenario where the number of invalidations are more than distribution. Following is the test case: 1. Created a publisher on a single table, say 'tconc_1'; 2. Created a second publisher on a partition table say 'tp'; 3. Created 'tcount' partitions for the table 'tp'. 4. two sessions are running in parallel, let's say S1 and S2. 5. Begin a transaction in S1. 6. S1: Insert a row in table 'tconc_1' S2: BEGIN; TRUNCATE TABLE tp; COMMIT; With patch, this will add 'tcount * 3' invalidation messages to transaction in session 1. S1: Insert a row in table 't_conc1' 7. COMMIT the transaction in S1. 8. run 'pg_logical_slot_get_binary_changes' to get the decoding changes. Performance: We see a degradation in performance. Results are an average of 5 runs. count of partitions | Head (sec) | Fix (sec) | Degradation (%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1000 | 0.114 | 0.118 | 3.50877193 5000 | 0.502 | 0.522 | 3.984063745 10000 | 1.012 | 1.024 | 1.185770751 I have also attached the test script here. And will also do further testing. Thanks and Regards, Shlok Kyal