Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>
From: Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Cc: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>,
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>,
Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-07-03T05:32:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Yeah, IMHO once we fix [1] this issue should be automatically resolved. > > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/akZUpiDa1UfmzYxL%40bdtpg > Yes, I tested the CLT patches on top of patch provided by Bertrand in [1]. And I verified that it fixes the Assertion issue. [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/akZUpiDa1UfmzYxL%40bdtpg Thanks, Shlok Kyal
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Allow logical replication conflicts to be logged to a table.
- a5918fddf10d master landed
-
Avoid orphaned objects dependencies
- 2fbb21170e90 19 (unreleased) cited