Horton

Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name

Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Date: 2022-07-15T07:47:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 at 04:44, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 03:59:55PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Please note that patch authors should not switch a patch as RfC by
> > themselves.  This is something that a reviewer should do.
>
> http://commitfest.cputube.org/simon-riggs.html

Thanks for showing me that, it is very helpful.

> This patch has been marked as waiting for a review, however the CF bot
> is completely red:

Yes, it is failing, but so is current HEAD, with some kind of libpq
pipelining error.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

Commits

  1. Tweak a bit the new TAP tests of REINDEX DATABASE/SYSTEM

  2. Rework logic and simplify syntax of REINDEX DATABASE/SYSTEM

  3. Add more tests for REINDEX DATABASE/SYSTEM with relfilenode changes