Re: Reducing power consumption on idle servers

Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>

From: Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Zheng Li <zhengli10@gmail.com>, Jim Nasby <nasbyj@amazon.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-11-21T07:36:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 at 05:07, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2022-11-21 at 10:13 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > I'll wait 24 hours before committing, to
> > provide a last chance for anyone who wants to complain about dropping
> > promote_trigger_file.
>
> Remove "promote_trigger_file"?  Now I have never seen anybody use that
> parameter, but I don't think that it is a good idea to deviate from our
> usual standard of deprecating a feature for about five years before
> actually removing it.

We aren't removing the ability to promote, just enforcing a change to
a better mechanism, hence I don't see a reason for a long(er)
deprecation period than we have already had.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/



Commits

  1. Remove promote_trigger_file.

  2. Add pg_promote function

  3. pg_ctl promote