Re: Reducing power consumption on idle servers
Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>
From: Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>,
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Zheng Li <zhengli10@gmail.com>, Jim Nasby <nasbyj@amazon.com>,
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-11-21T07:36:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 at 05:07, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote: > > On Mon, 2022-11-21 at 10:13 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote: > > I'll wait 24 hours before committing, to > > provide a last chance for anyone who wants to complain about dropping > > promote_trigger_file. > > Remove "promote_trigger_file"? Now I have never seen anybody use that > parameter, but I don't think that it is a good idea to deviate from our > usual standard of deprecating a feature for about five years before > actually removing it. We aren't removing the ability to promote, just enforcing a change to a better mechanism, hence I don't see a reason for a long(er) deprecation period than we have already had. -- Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
Commits
-
Remove promote_trigger_file.
- cd4329d9393f 16.0 landed
-
Add pg_promote function
- 10074651e335 12.0 cited
-
pg_ctl promote
- 4695da5ae97b 9.1.0 cited