Re: Hash index build performance tweak from sorting

On Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 02:32, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 03:37, Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > Using the above test case, I'm getting a further 4-7% improvement on
> > already committed code with the attached patch, which follows your
> > proposal.
> >
> > The patch passes info via a state object, useful to avoid API churn in
> > later patches.
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> I took this patch for a spin and saw a 2.5% performance increase using
> the random INT test that Tom posted. The index took an average of
> 7227.47 milliseconds on master and 7045.05 with the patch applied.

Hi David,

Thanks for tests and review. I'm just jumping on a plane, so may not
respond in detail until next Mon.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/