Re: GiST README typos
John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
To: Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-11-06T09:38:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Cosmetic fixes in GiST README
- 07b3df5d00cb 19 (unreleased) landed
On Thu, Nov 6, 2025 at 1:36 PM Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 7:00 PM John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > being empty. Whenever we find one, we acquire a lock on the parent and child > > -page, re-check that the child page is still empty. Then, we remove the > > +page, then re-check that the child page is still empty. Then, we remove the > > downlink and mark the child as deleted, and release the locks. > > > > I still find this a bit awkward -- perhaps "and re-check"? The last > > sentence could do with just the last "and" as well, I think, but > > that's a style consideration and not a grammar fix. > > I nearly wrote it that way myself. It's nice that it avoids the double > "then". So I agree, let's go with "and re-check". Pushed that way, thanks! -- John Naylor Amazon Web Services