Re: Re-add recently-removed tests for ltree and intarray

John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>

From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>

To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>

Date: 2026-05-15T06:33:53Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

Re-add regression tests for ltree and intarray
- 092b570a72dd 14 (unreleased) landed
- 4503c9771683 15 (unreleased) landed
- f71f72e89abf 16 (unreleased) landed
- a6c430cabedc 17 (unreleased) landed
- f45f418275b1 18 (unreleased) landed
- 27bdae84137f 19 (unreleased) landed
Remove test cases for field overflows in intarray and ltree.
- 906ea101d0d5 19 (unreleased) cited

On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 9:49 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> writes:
> > FWIW, I tried to reproduce with the former new tests un-reverted, and
> > didn't see stack overflow on the following, so unless I fat-fingered
> > that I wonder if there's something more specific on the previously
> > failing members:
>
> > ppc64le / gcc 8.5 / Linux kernel 4.18
> > S390X / gcc 13.3 / Linux kernel 6.8
>
> Hm, did you use -O0 ?

I just now tried -O0 on yesterday's master with ppc64le, with the
previous new tests re-added, and it did fail. Then, pulled in master
with the tests just now committed, and it passed.

-- 
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services