Re: BUG #19450: Where is checksum_block.inc.c after master install?

John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>

From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: rekgrpth@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2026-04-07T08:56:51Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Mon, Apr 6, 2026 at 10:07 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Mon, Apr 6, 2026 at 9:50 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> One could argue that the real bug is having put a .c file into
> >> the include/ tree in the first place.  Why was it done like that?
> >> Couldn't it be a .h file?
>
> > That was the way it was first coded. I thought of this way to avoid
> > adding an exception to headerscheck. I can reverse that decision
> > easily, but I may not get to it today.
>
> Ah, the good ol' law of conservation of cruft.  But on the whole
> I think naming it .h not .c is less crufty.  Agreed that there's
> no great urgency about changing it.

Okay, done that way as of commit 8c3e22a8f.

-- 
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services



Commits

  1. Use .h for the file containing the page checksum code fragment