Re: Correct comment wording in extension.c
John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
To: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Cc: li carol <carol.li2025@outlook.com>, albert tan <alterttan1223@gmail.com>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-01-13T05:40:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jan 11, 2026 at 11:58 AM Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote: > v4-0001 looks good to me. When I say I'm going to commit "unless/barring", no response is necessary unless there is a problem. > I just went through extension.c and got a few more comment improvements. I put them in v5-0002, please take a look. - * for them therefore uses about O(N^2) time when there are N versions of + * for them therefore uses O(N^2) time when there are N versions of - /* store the OID of the namespace to-be-changed */ + /* store the OID of the namespace to be changed */ Please read these responses to you from last week: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1909358.1767854695%40sss.pgh.pa.us https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7k27ut6kugt2mizo5cy5wplbbrz4ccbkxvsc2iqu5yde344iya%40dxktdjw6uvi2 I've pushed v4. -- John Naylor Amazon Web Services
Commits
-
Improve some comment wording and grammar in extension.c
- 94a24b4ee5aa 19 (unreleased) landed