Re: Correct comment wording in extension.c

John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>

From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
To: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Cc: li carol <carol.li2025@outlook.com>, albert tan <alterttan1223@gmail.com>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-01-13T05:40:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jan 11, 2026 at 11:58 AM Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote:
> v4-0001 looks good to me.

When I say I'm going to commit "unless/barring", no response is
necessary unless there is a problem.

> I just went through extension.c and got a few more comment improvements. I put them in v5-0002, please take a look.

- * for them therefore uses about O(N^2) time when there are N versions of
+ * for them therefore uses O(N^2) time when there are N versions of

- /* store the OID of the namespace to-be-changed */
+ /* store the OID of the namespace to be changed */

Please read these responses to you from last week:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1909358.1767854695%40sss.pgh.pa.us
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7k27ut6kugt2mizo5cy5wplbbrz4ccbkxvsc2iqu5yde344iya%40dxktdjw6uvi2

I've pushed v4.

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services



Commits

  1. Improve some comment wording and grammar in extension.c