Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL
John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
To: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>,
pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Date: 2025-09-24T06:42:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Generate EUC_CN mappings from gb18030-2022.ucm
- 48566180efff 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Update GB18030 encoding from version 2000 to 2022
- 5334620eef8f 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Generate GB18030 mappings from the Unicode Consortium's UCM file
- cfa6cd29271e 19 (unreleased) landed
On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 2:59 PM John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> wrote: > The only change I made for v9 is to reword the regression test > addition from "upgrades" to "change". I'm planning to commit next week > unless there are objections. (If anyone otherwise busy with the PG18 > release wants a chance to weigh in, let me know and I'll hold off). Pushed. On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 4:45 PM Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote: > So, no immediate action to take, right? I may work out such a query before starting of release note work. Sounds good. Were you also interested in seeing if EUC_CN can use the same UCM file? That would allow us to get rid of the XML file. -- John Naylor Amazon Web Services