Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL
John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
To: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>,
pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Date: 2025-09-29T04:03:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Generate EUC_CN mappings from gb18030-2022.ucm
- 48566180efff 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Update GB18030 encoding from version 2000 to 2022
- 5334620eef8f 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Generate GB18030 mappings from the Unicode Consortium's UCM file
- cfa6cd29271e 19 (unreleased) landed
On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 4:18 PM Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote: > I am not sure if you should also upgrade the UCM file to 2022 version, but if we need, let’s do it with a separate commit. If they can all use the same file, we should just do that for the sake of simplicity, in which case a separate commit is just extra noise. -- John Naylor Amazon Web Services