Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL
John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
To: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>,
pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Date: 2025-09-16T09:36:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Generate EUC_CN mappings from gb18030-2022.ucm
- 48566180efff 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Update GB18030 encoding from version 2000 to 2022
- 5334620eef8f 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Generate GB18030 mappings from the Unicode Consortium's UCM file
- cfa6cd29271e 19 (unreleased) landed
On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 8:57 AM Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote: > * In 0003, updated a function comment in utf8_and_gb18030.c to address John's comment about reference to the xml file. Thanks, but the entire point of that comment change was to remove the reference to the XML file, yet it didn't actually do that. Also, the words in my email were to explain to you what should go there and why. That doesn't mean those words belong in the comment. The comment change seems like it belongs in the preparatory commit anyway, so I put the links there and pushed 0001 (along with the squashed 0002). -- John Naylor Amazon Web Services