Re: Compressed TOAST Slicing
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Paul Ramsey <pramsey@cleverelephant.ca>, rafia.sabih@enterprisedb.com, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-02-20T18:37:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add support for partial TOAST decompression
- 4d0e994eed83 12.0 landed
-
Remove remaining hard-wired OID references in the initial catalog data.
- 3aa0395d4ed3 12.0 cited
-
Rephrase references to "time qualification".
- ebcc7bf949ba 12.0 cited
On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 16:27, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > > > Sure, but we have the choice between something that benefits just a few > > cases or one that benefits more widely. > > > > If we all only work on the narrow use cases that are right in front of us > > at the present moment then we would not have come this far. I'm sure many > > GIS applications also store JSONB data, so you would be helping the > > performance of the whole app, even if there isn't much JSON in PostGIS. > > -1, I think this is blowing up the complexity of a already useful patch, > even though there's no increase in complexity due to the patch proposed > here. I totally get wanting incremental decompression for jsonb, but I > don't see why Paul should be held hostage for that. > Not sure I agree with your emotive language. Review comments != holding hostages. If we add one set of code now and need to add another different one later, we will have 2 sets of code that do similar things. I'm surprised to hear you think that is a good thing. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ <http://www.2ndquadrant.com/> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services