Re: Race conditions with WAL sender PID lookups
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>,
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-06-15T08:04:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 15 June 2017 at 02:59, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: > Formally, the causative commit is the one that removed the superuser() test, > namely 25fff40. > > [Action required within three days. This is a generic notification.] > > The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item. Simon, > since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open > item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a > v10 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on > open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days of > this message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers may > discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed > well in advance of shipping v10. Consequently, I will appreciate your efforts > toward speedy resolution. Thanks. > > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com Thanks for letting me know. I'm on leave at present, so won't be able to get to this until June 20, though will make it a priority for then. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Commits
-
Fix locking in WAL receiver/sender shmem state structs
- 572d6ee6d41b 10.0 landed
-
pgstat: add WAL receiver status view & SRF
- b1a9bad9e744 9.6.0 cited