Re: User defined data types in Logical Replication

Dang Minh Huong <kakalot49@gmail.com>

From: Đặng Minh Hướng <kakalot49@gmail.com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Huong Dangminh <huo-dangminh@ys.jp.nec.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>, Hiroshi Yanagisawa <hir-yanagisawa@ut.jp.nec.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: 2018-04-11T12:26:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2018-04-11 10:16 GMT+09:00 Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>:

> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 7:57 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Attached an updated test patch added the above test(0002 patch). Since
> > for this test case it's enough to use existing test functions I didn't
> > create new test functions. Also I found that the local data type name
> > in log for data type conversion isn't qualified whereas the remote
> > data type is always qualified. Attached 0001 patch fixes that.
> >
>
> The original issue has been fixed and this entry on CommitFest has
> been marked as "Committed" but there are still works for improving
> testing. Perhaps I should register a new entry of remaining patches to
> next CommitFest.


Thanks. I appreciate it.

---
Dang Minh Huong

Commits

  1. logical replication: fix OID type mapping mechanism