Thread

  1. Re: Speed up COPY FROM text/CSV parsing using SIMD

    Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com> — 2025-12-31T13:04:15Z

    Hi,
    
    On Wed, 24 Dec 2025 at 18:08, KAZAR Ayoub <ma_kazar@esi.dz> wrote:
    >
    > Hello,
    > Following the same path of optimizing COPY FROM using SIMD, i found that COPY TO can also benefit from this.
    >
    > I attached a small patch that uses SIMD to skip data and advance as far as the first special character is found, then fallback to scalar processing for that character and re-enter the SIMD path again...
    > There's two ways to do this:
    > 1) Essentially we do SIMD until we find a special character, then continue scalar path without re-entering SIMD again.
    > - This gives from 10% to 30% speedups depending on the weight of special characters in the attribute, we don't lose anything here since it advances with SIMD until it can't (using the previous scripts: 1/3, 2/3 specials chars).
    >
    > 2) Do SIMD path, then use scalar path when we hit a special character, keep re-entering the SIMD path each time.
    > - This is equivalent to the COPY FROM story, we'll need to find the same heuristic to use for both COPY FROM/TO to reduce the regressions (same regressions: around from 20% to 30% with 1/3, 2/3 specials chars).
    >
    > Something else to note is that the scalar path for COPY TO isn't as heavy as the state machine in COPY FROM.
    >
    > So if we find the sweet spot for the heuristic, doing the same for COPY TO will be trivial and always beneficial.
    > Attached is 0004 which is option 1 (SIMD without re-entering), 0005 is the second one.
    
    Patches look correct to me. I think we could move these SIMD code
    portions into a shared function to remove duplication, although that
    might have a performance impact. I have not benchmarked these patches
    yet.
    
    Another consideration is that these patches might need their own
    thread, though I am not completely sure about this yet.
    
    One question: what do you think about having a 0004-style approach for
    COPY FROM? What I have in mind is running SIMD for each line & column,
    stopping SIMD once it can no longer skip an entire chunk, and then
    continuing with the next line & column.
    
    -- 
    Regards,
    Nazir Bilal Yavuz
    Microsoft