Re: Show WAL write and fsync stats in pg_stat_io
Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>
From: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>,
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, "bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com"
<bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Date: 2024-02-19T07:28:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix copy-paste error related to the autovacuum launcher in pgstat_io.c
- 17d8bba6dad1 18.0 landed
-
Move SQL tests of pg_stat_io for WAL data to recovery test 029_stats_restart
- 428fadb7e97e 18.0 landed
-
Add data for WAL in pg_stat_io and backend statistics
- a051e71e28a1 18.0 landed
-
Improve comment on top of pgstat_count_io_op_time()
- b998fedab74c 18.0 landed
-
Refactor pgstat_prepare_io_time() with an input argument instead of a GUC
- 3c9d9acae0bc 17.0 landed
Hi, On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 at 04:22, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 03:20:39PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote: > > I agree with your points. While the other I/O related work is > > happening we can discuss what we should do in the variable op_byte > > cases. Also, this is happening only for WAL right now but if we try to > > extend pg_stat_io in the future, that problem possibly will rise > > again. So, it could be good to come up with a general solution, not > > only for WAL. > > Okay, I've marked the patch as RwF for this CF. I wanted to inform you that the 73f0a13266 commit changed all WALRead calls to read variable bytes, only the WAL receiver was reading variable bytes before. -- Regards, Nazir Bilal Yavuz Microsoft