Re: meson: Non-feature feature options
Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>
From: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-03-03T10:01:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v3-0001-meson-Refactor-SSL-option.patch (text/x-diff) patch v3-0001
Hi, On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 at 12:16, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > On 02.03.23 11:41, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote: > > I am kind of confused. I added these checks for considering other SSL > > implementations in the future, for this reason I have two nested if > > checks. The top one is for checking if we need to search an SSL > > library and the nested one is for checking if we need to search this > > specific SSL library. What do you think? > > I suppose that depends on how you envision integrating other SSL > libraries into this logic. It's not that important right now; if the > structure makes sense to you, that's fine. > > Please send an updated patch with the small changes that have been > mentioned. > The updated patch is attached. Regards, Nazir Bilal Yavuz Microsoft
Commits
-
meson: fix openssl detection issues in 6a30027
- 727400994d5a 16.0 landed
-
meson: Make auto the default of the ssl option
- 6a3002715eca 16.0 landed