Re: Custom oauth validator options

Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com>

From: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com>
To: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: VASUKI M <vasukianand0119@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, david.g.johnston@gmail.com, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, myon@debian.org
Date: 2025-12-18T18:28:11Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Might be more reason to look into the GUC system?

I am already thinking about that, I have some ideas for a proof of
concept, but no working prototype yet. But without requiring
shared_preload_libraries, we can't do early error reporting during
postmaster startup about custom parameters. Is that okay? GUCs already
work this way, and this could be a bit safer (reporting unknown
parameters/refusing to proceed during login, when we can completely
parse all parameters), but it would be different compared to how
pg_hba is handled currently.