Re: Custom oauth validator options

Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com>

From: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com>

To: VASUKI M <vasukianand0119@gmail.com>

Cc: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, david.g.johnston@gmail.com, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, myon@debian.org

Date: 2025-12-18T09:08:10Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

0001-Adding-hooks-to-HBA-parsing-option-c.patch (application/octet-stream)

> Personally I would go with either (a) or (c), and I was planning to
> clean up / improve / share my (c) patch as a second attempt for this
> thread, if it didn't receive any replies. I can still do that, so that
> we have multiple test implementations.

I attached the patch. It modifies one of the existing oauth_validator
tests to showcase how it works, but in theory it isn't dependent on
oauth. It however requires shared_preload_libraries (that is common
for all options), maybe oauth_validator_libraries could imply that?