Re: refactoring basebackup.c
Dipesh Pandit <dipesh.pandit@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Document BaseBackupSync and BaseBackupWrite wait events.
- 749320cdc3fd 15.3 landed
- 4b1ad19a4e22 16.0 landed
-
Support long distance matching for zstd compression
- 2820adf7755d 16.0 landed
-
Fix possible NULL-pointer-deference in backup_compression.c.
- 8e053dc6dfbe 15.0 landed
-
Allow parallel zstd compression when taking a base backup.
- 51c0d186d99a 15.0 landed
-
Make PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster::run_log() return a useful value.
- ad4f2c47de44 15.0 landed
-
Fix a few goofs in new backup compression code.
- 61762426e6ed 15.0 landed
-
Replace BASE_BACKUP COMPRESSION_LEVEL option with COMPRESSION_DETAIL.
- ffd53659c46a 15.0 landed
-
Add 'basebackup_to_shell' contrib module.
- c6306db24bd9 15.0 landed
-
Allow extensions to add new backup targets.
- e4ba69f3f4a1 15.0 landed
-
Change HAVE_LIBLZ4 and HAVE_LIBZSTD tests to USE_LZ4 and USE_ZSTD.
- 75eae090876f 15.0 landed
-
pg_basebackup: Clean up some bogus file extension tests.
- d6f1cdeb9a9e 15.0 landed
-
pg_basebackup: Avoid unclean failure with server-compression and -D -.
- b2de45f9200d 15.0 landed
-
Fix LZ4 tests for remaining buffer space.
- 1d4be6be65ab 15.0 landed
-
Add support for zstd base backup compression.
- 7cf085f077df 15.0 landed
-
pg_basebackup: Allow client-side LZ4 (de)compression.
- 751b8d23b788 15.0 landed
-
Add suport for server-side LZ4 base backup compression.
- dab298471ff2 15.0 landed
-
Add min() and max() aggregates for xid8.
- 400fc6b6487d 15.0 cited
-
Remove superfluous variable.
- 82331ed4dd60 15.0 landed
-
pg_basebackup: Cleaner handling when compression is multiply specified.
- 51891d5a9560 15.0 landed
-
Allow server-side compression to be used with -Fp.
- d45099425eb1 15.0 landed
-
pg_basebackup: Fix a couple of recently-introduced bugs.
- dabf63bc9a5b 15.0 landed
-
Tidy up a few cosmetic issues related to pg_basebackup.
- e1f860f13459 15.0 landed
-
Server-side gzip compression.
- 0ad8032910d5 15.0 landed
-
Unbreak pg_basebackup/t/010_pg_basebackup.pl on msys
- 4f0bcc735038 15.0 cited
-
Suppress variable-set-but-not-used warning from clang 13.
- dc43fc9b3aa3 15.0 cited
-
Extend the options of pg_basebackup to control compression
- 5c649fe15336 15.0 cited
-
Support base backup targets.
- 3500ccc39b0d 15.0 landed
-
Modify pg_basebackup to use a new COPY subprotocol for base backups.
- cc333f32336f 15.0 landed
-
Document that tar archives are now properly terminated.
- 81fca310b38e 15.0 landed
-
Fix thinko in bbsink_throttle_manifest_contents.
- 1b098da20093 15.0 landed
-
Have the server properly terminate tar archives.
- 5a1007a5088c 15.0 landed
-
Minimal fix for unterminated tar archive problem.
- 57b5a9646d97 15.0 landed
-
Introduce 'bbstreamer' abstraction to modularize pg_basebackup.
- 23a1c6578c87 15.0 landed
-
Introduce 'bbsink' abstraction to modularize base backup code.
- bef47ff85df1 15.0 landed
-
Refactor basebackup.c's _tarWriteDir() function.
- 967a17fe2fa7 15.0 landed
-
Flexible options for CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT.
- 0266e98c6b86 15.0 landed
-
Flexible options for BASE_BACKUP.
- 0ba281cb4bf9 15.0 landed
Hi, > > It will be good if we can also fix > > CreateWalTarMethod to support LZ4 and ZSTD. > Ok we will see, either Dipesh or I will take care of it. I took a look at the CreateWalTarMethod to support LZ4 compression for WAL files. The current implementation involves a 3 step to backup a WAL file to a tar archive. For each file: 1. It first writes the header in the function tar_open_for_write, flushes the contents of tar to disk and stores the header offset. 2. Next, the contents of WAL are written to the tar archive. 3. In the end, it recalculates the checksum in function tar_close() and overwrites the header at an offset stored in step #1. The need for overwriting header in CreateWalTarMethod is mainly related to partial WAL files where the size of the WAL file < WalSegSize. The file is being padded and checksum is recalculated after adding pad bytes. If we go ahead and implement LZ4 support for CreateWalTarMethod then we have a problem here at step #3. In order to achieve better compression ratio, compressed LZ4 blocks are linked to each other and these blocks are decoded sequentially. If we overwrite the header as part of step #3 then it corrupts the link between compressed LZ4 blocks. Although LZ4 provides an option to write the compressed block independently (using blockMode option set to LZ4F_blockIndepedent) but it is still a problem because we don't know if overwriting the header after recalculating the checksum will not overlap the boundary of the next block. GZIP manages to overcome this problem as it provides an option to turn on/off compression on the fly while writing a compressed archive with the help of zlib library function deflateParams(). The current gzip implementation for CreateWalTarMethod uses this library function to turn off compression just before step #1 and it writes the uncompressed header of size equal to TAR_BLOCK_SIZE. It uses the same library function to turn on the compression for writing the contents of the WAL file as part of step #2. It again turns off the compression just before step #3 to overwrite the header. The header is overwritten at the same offset with size equal to TAR_BLOCK_SIZE. Since GZIP provides this option to enable/disable compression, it is possible to control the size of data we are writing to a compressed archive. Even if we overwrite an already written block in a compressed archive there is no risk of it overlapping with the boundary of the next block. This mechanism is not available in LZ4 and ZSTD. In order to support LZ4 and ZSTD compression for CreateWalTarMethod we may need to refactor this code unless I am missing something. We need to somehow add the padding bytes in case of partial WAL before we send it to the compressed archive. This will make sure that all files which are being compressed does not require any padding as the size is always equal to WalSegSize. There is no need to recalculate the checksum and we can avoid overwriting the header as part of step #3. Thoughts? Thanks, Dipesh