Re: split TOAST support out of postgres.h

Hi,

I've thought about this while working on Pluggable TOAST and 64-bit
TOAST value ID myself. Agree with #2 to seem the best of the above.
There are not so many places where a new header should be included.

On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 6:08 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> > ... Then we could either
>
> > 1) Include varatt.h in postgres.h, similar to elog.h and palloc.h.  That
> > way we clean up the files a bit but don't change any external interfaces.
>
> > 2) Just let everyone who needs it include the new file.
>
> > 3) Compromise: You can avoid most "damage" by having fmgr.h include
> > varatt.h.  That satisfies most data types and extension code.  That way,
> > there are only a few places that need an explicit include of varatt.h.
>
> > I went with the last option in my patch.
>
> I dunno, #3 seems kind of unprincipled.  Also, since fmgr.h is included
> so widely, I doubt it is buying very much in terms of reducing header
> footprint.  How bad is it to do #2?
>
>                         regards, tom lane
>
>
>

-- 
Regards,
Nikita Malakhov
Postgres Professional
https://postgrespro.ru/