Re: proposal: schema variables

Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-11-02T15:07:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-performance

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Move WAL sequence code into its own file

  2. Add ExplainState argument to pg_plan_query() and planner().

  3. Don't include access/htup_details.h in executor/tuptable.h

  4. Refactor to avoid code duplication in transformPLAssignStmt.

  5. Avoid including commands/dbcommands.h in so many places

  6. Restrict psql meta-commands in plain-text dumps.

  7. Split func.sgml into more manageable pieces

  8. Fix squashing algorithm for query texts

  9. EXPLAIN: Always use two fractional digits for row counts.

  10. Preliminary refactoring of plpgsql expression construction.

  11. plpgsql: pure parser and reentrant scanner

  12. Add some sanity checks in executor for query ID reporting

  13. Fix misleading error message context

  14. Add macros for looping through a List without a ListCell.

On 26 October 2017 at 15:21, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I propose a  new database object - a variable.

Didn't we have a pretty long discussion about this already in

Yeah.

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAMsr%2BYF0G8_FehQyFS8gSfnEer9OPsMOvpfniDJOVGQzJzHzsw%40mail.gmail.com#CAMsr+YF0G8_FehQyFS8gSfnEer9OPsMOvpfniDJOVGQzJzHzsw@mail.gmail.com

It'd be nice if you summarised any outcomes from that and addressed
it, rather than taking this as a new topic.

-- 
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services