Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq

Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>
To: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Cc: Vaishnavi Prabakaran <vaishnaviprabakaran@gmail.com>, Daniel Verite <daniel@manitou-mail.org>, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>, "Prabakaran, Vaishnavi" <VaishnaviP@fast.au.fujitsu.com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>, Dmitry Igrishin <dmitigr@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Manuel Kniep <m.kniep@web.de>, "fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp" <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>, "Iwata, Aya" <iwata.aya@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: 2017-03-25T12:50:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 24 March 2017 at 23:21, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
> Hi Vaishnavi,
>
> On 3/19/17 9:32 PM, Vaishnavi Prabakaran wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:37 AM, Daniel Verite <daniel@manitou-mail.org
>>
>> Please let me know if you think this is not enough but wanted to update
>> section 33.6 also?
>
>
> Daniel, any input here?
>
>>     > I would also like to hear Craig's opinion on it before applying this
>> fix
>>     > to the original patch, just to make sure am not missing anything
>> here.
>
>
> Craig?

I'm fairly confident that I overlooked single row mode entirely in the
original patch, though it's long enough ago that it's hard for me to
remember exactly.

I don't really have much of an opinion on the best handling of it.

I would expect to be setting single-row mode just before I requested
the *result* from the next pending query, since it relates to result
processing rather than query dispatch. But that's about all the
opinion I have here.

-- 
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


Commits

  1. Add libpq pipeline mode support to pgbench

  2. Implement pipeline mode in libpq