Thread

  1. Re: Improve GetConfigOptionValues function

    Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres@gmail.com> — 2023-01-23T09:59:16Z

    > The v2 patch looks good to me except the comment around
    > ConfigOptionIsShowable() which is too verbose. How about just "Return
    > whether the GUC variable is visible or not."?
    
    Sounds good. Updated in the v3 patch attached.
    
    
    > I think you can add it to CF, if not done, to not lose track of it.
    
    Added https://commitfest.postgresql.org/42/4140/
    
    Thanks & Regards,
    Nitin Jadhav
    
    On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 11:30 AM Bharath Rupireddy
    <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 3:27 PM Nitin Jadhav
    > <nitinjadhavpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
    > >
    > > > Possibly a better answer is to refactor into separate functions,
    > > > along the lines of
    > > >
    > > > static bool
    > > > ConfigOptionIsShowable(struct config_generic *conf)
    > > >
    > > > static void
    > > > GetConfigOptionValues(struct config_generic *conf, const char **values)
    > >
    > > Nice suggestion. Attached a patch for the same. Please share the
    > > comments if any.
    >
    > The v2 patch looks good to me except the comment around
    > ConfigOptionIsShowable() which is too verbose. How about just "Return
    > whether the GUC variable is visible or not."?
    >
    > I think you can add it to CF, if not done, to not lose track of it.
    >
    > --
    > Bharath Rupireddy
    > PostgreSQL Contributors Team
    > RDS Open Source Databases
    > Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com