Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)
Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
From: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
To: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>, Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>, "Harold A. Giménez" <harold.gimenez@gmail.com>
Date: 2012-07-23T15:02:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-performance
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:41 AM, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 08:29:16AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> >> >> I'm not sure how you automate testing a pull-the-plug scenario. > > I have a dim memory of how the FreeBSD project was alleged to have > done it, namely by rigging a serial port (yes, it was that long ago) > to the power supply of another machine and randomly cycling the power. On Linux, echo b > /proc/sysrq-trigger Is supposed to take it down instantly, with no flushing of dirty buffers. Cheers, Jeff
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Scan the buffer pool just once, not once per fork, during relation drop.
- ece01aae4792 9.2.0 cited