Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint

Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>

From: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-02-15T23:05:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
wrote:

Yeah, that's my view as well. I'm all for including it in verbose mode.
>
> *Iff* we can get a progress indicator through the checkpoint we could
> include that in --progress mode. But that's a different patch, of course,
> but it shouldn't be included in the default output even if we find it.
>
>
I think it should show up in --progress mode.  It would be great if we
could show fine-grained progress reports on the checkpoint, but if we can't
do that we should still report as fine as we are able to, which is that a
checkpoint is in progress. Otherwise we are setting the perfect as the
enemy of the good.

Cheers,

Jeff

Commits

  1. Back-patch checkpoint clarification docs and pg_basebackup updates