Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint
Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
From: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>,
Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-02-15T23:05:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: Yeah, that's my view as well. I'm all for including it in verbose mode. > > *Iff* we can get a progress indicator through the checkpoint we could > include that in --progress mode. But that's a different patch, of course, > but it shouldn't be included in the default output even if we find it. > > I think it should show up in --progress mode. It would be great if we could show fine-grained progress reports on the checkpoint, but if we can't do that we should still report as fine as we are able to, which is that a checkpoint is in progress. Otherwise we are setting the perfect as the enemy of the good. Cheers, Jeff
Commits
-
Back-patch checkpoint clarification docs and pg_basebackup updates
- bd34e7f19b40 9.4.12 landed
- 2843d5d657be 9.5.7 landed
- b88b929a7071 9.6.3 landed