Re: A failure in prepared_xacts test
Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
From: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-04-30T00:43:32Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 9:45 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> writes: > > I noticed that some TAP tests from recovery and subscription would > > select the count from pg_prepared_xacts. I wonder if these tests would > > be affected if there are any prepared transactions on the backend. > > TAP tests shouldn't be at risk, because there is no "make > installcheck" equivalent for them. Each TAP test creates its own > database instance (or maybe several), so that instance won't have > anything else going on. Thank you for the explanation. I wasn't aware of this before. Thanks Richard
Commits
-
Remove auth-options support from initdb
- 83ae824c87a5 17.0 landed
-
Make two-phase tests of ECPG and main suite more concurrent-proof
- 7e61e4cc7cfc 17.0 landed
-
initdb: Add options --auth-local and --auth-host
- 8a02339e9ba3 9.2.0 cited