Re: A minor adjustment to get_cheapest_path_for_pathkeys
Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
From: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-09-07T02:21:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v2-0001-Reorder-the-tests-in-get_cheapest_path_for_pathkeys.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v2-0001
On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 8:50 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 2:45 AM Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com> wrote: > > In my opinion, we can do some stuff to improve the ROI. > > - Authors should do as much as possible, mainly a better commit > > message. As for this patch, the commit message is " Adjustment > > to get_cheapest_path_for_pathkeys" which I don't think matches > > our culture. > > I agree. I don't think the patch submitter is obliged to try to write > a good commit message, but people who contribute regularly or are > posting large stacks of complex patches are probably well-advised to > try. It makes life easier for committers and even for reviewers trying > to make sense of their patches. Fair point. So I had a go at writing a commit message for this patch as attached. Thanks for all the reviews. Thanks Richard
Commits
-
Reorder tests in get_cheapest_path_for_pathkeys().
- 9caf042088e7 17.0 landed
-
Fix an assortment of improper usages of string functions
- 8b26769bc441 16.0 cited